The Australian Soldier Settlement Scheme was part of state and Commonwealth governments' repatriation plans to assist returned men become farmers after the Great War. In New South Wales about 9,000 men including a small number of women became soldier settlers under this scheme. One of the tenures promoted by the New South Wales government was group settlement. In the County of Cumberland, the greater Sydney area, six group soldier settlements were established between 1917 and 1920. All were small acreage, largely planned as poultry farms, with some viticulture and market garden blocks. Group settlement was promoted as suitable for men with no capital, little farming experience or those with war-related injuries. Seen as a fitting reward for service to their country, a small soldier settlement farm was an opportunity for many men to become a landowner. This thesis provides a re-evaluation of the significance of group soldier settlement, linking it to earlier utopian ideals of communal living. It argues Labor politicians, notably Chris Watson and William Holman, promoted these ideals believing they would improve working men's lives. Planned to benefit both the state's economy and the ex-serviceman, this thesis argues group soldier settlement was a realistic way to settle large numbers of inexperienced men under supervision in a state that had little available Crown lands. It recognises government planners had little concept of the impact war-related injuries would have when ex-servicemen returned to civilian life, but argues plans for partially disabled men were inadequate post-war. However, this thesis argues group soldier settlement was a chimera. More than 350 tried on these settlements, but few lasted. Soldier settlers on these group settlements were destined to fail largely due to their war-related physical and psychological disabilities. Pre-war most had relied on their physical strength and fitness working as unskilled labourers for a living. The war robbed them of their health, and gave the men few options. Following discharge they needed to find permanent work to support themselves with dignity. Group soldier settlement therefore seemed a practical option, close to the on-going medical treatment many required. A war pension was never a living wage to support a man and his family. Governments were confident group settlement would work - it did not. Forced to leave because of their health, many of these soldier settlers never worked again. For returned men on the group soldier settlements in the County of Cumberland, the shadows of the Great War lasted a lifetime.

This thesis examines the experiences and fate of the Australian soldiers captured at Gallipoli during World War I and has attempted to provide a coherent and detailed narrative of the experiences of capture and imprisonment of these neglected soldiers of the Gallipoli campaign. The topic has received scant attention from historians for the past ninety years despite the professional and public attention paid to the Gallipoli campaign and subsequent Anzac legend. For the first time, the thesis has identified and verified the number of prisoners, as well as broadening the source base for the prisoner of war experience to include relevant Turkish sources. The historical context of Western 'orientalist' attitudes towards the Ottomans that underpinned many contemporary sources has also been examined. A central theme has been to challenge the myths that have developed since the end of World War I, including the belief that few of the captured Australians returned home and that their experiences mirrored that of the brutal World War II POW experience under the Japanese. The thesis is based on extensive archival research in Australia, Britain and Turkey, site visits, oral history and local tradition.