Options
Joseph, Stephen
- PublicationIs current biochar research addressing global soil constraints for sustainable agriculture?(Elsevier BV, 2016)
;Zhang, Dengxiao ;Yan, Ming ;Zheng, Jinwei ;Zhang, Xuhui ;Zheng, Jufeng ;Crowley, David ;Filley, Timothy R ;Pan, Genxing ;Niu, Yaru ;Liu, Xiaoyu; ;Chen, De ;Bian, Rongjun ;Cheng, Kun ;Li, LianqingSoil degradation is an increasing threat to the sustainability of agriculture worldwide. Use of biochar from bio-wastes has been proposed as an option for improving soil fertility, degraded land restoration, and mitigating the greenhouse gas emissions associated with agriculture. Over the past 10 years, there have been hundreds of research studies on biochar from which it may be possible to determine appropriate methods for use of biochar to improve sustainable agriculture. To address potential gaps in our understanding of the role of biochar in agriculture, in this paper are reviewed the studies of 798 publications of field-, greenhouse- and laboratory-based biochar amendment soil experiments conducted as of August, 2015. Here we report the findings from a quantitative assessment. The majority of published studies have been performed in developed countries in soils that are less impaired than those found in many developing countries. The majority of the works involves laboratory and greenhouse pot experiments rather than field studies. Most published studies on biochar have used small kiln or lab prepared biochars rather than commercial scale biochars. And, most studies utilize wood and municipal waste feedstocks rather than crop residues though the later are often available in agriculture. Overall, the lack of well-designed long-term field studies using biochar produced in commercial processes, may be limiting our current understanding of biochar's potential to enhance crop production and mitigate climate change. We further recommend greater alliance between researchers and biochar production facilities to foster the uptake of this important technology at a global scale. - PublicationQuantifying the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Benefits of Utilising Straw Biochar and Enriched Biochar(Elsevier BV, 2016)
;Mohammadi, Ali; ;Anh Mai, Thi Lan ;Anaya de la Rosa, Ruy ;Brandao, Miguel; This study investigated the carbon footprint of two different biochar production systems for application to paddy fields. The impacts of using rice straw-derived biochar in raw form (System A) were compared with those arising from using rice straw biochar enriched with lime, clay, ash and manure (System B). The GHG abatement of the management of one Mg of rice straw in Systems A and B was estimated at 0.27 and 0.61 Mg CO₂-eq, respectively, in spring season, and 0.30 and 1.22 Mg CO₂-eq in summer. The difference is mainly due to greater reduction of soil CH₄ emissions by enriched biochar. - PublicationBiochar increases nitrogen retention and lowers greenhouse gas emissions when added to composting poultry litter(Elsevier Ltd, 2017-03)
; ; ; ; ; ;Cowie, Alan ;Harden, StevenBiochar has intrinsic and nascent structural and sorption properties that may alter the physical and chemical properties of a composting mixture thus influencing the production of greenhouse gases [GHGs" nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4)]. In this study, contrasting biochars produced from green-waste (GWB) or poultry litter (PLB) were incorporated into a composting mixture containing poultry litter and straw, and GHG emissions were measured in situ during composting using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Emissions of N2O from the biochar-amended composting mixtures decreased significantly (P < 0.05) soon after commencement of the composting process compared with the non-amended control. The cumulative emissions of N2O over 8 weeks in the GWB composting mixture (GWBC), PLB composting mixture (PLBC) and control (no biochar) were 4.2, 5.0 and 14.0 g N2O-N kg−1 of total nitrogen (TN) in composting mixture, respectively (P < 0.05). The CH4 emissions were significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the GWBC and PLBC treatments than the control during the period from day 8 to day 36, when anaerobic conditions likely prevailed. The cumulative CH4 emissions were 12, 18 and 80 mg CH4-C kg−1 of total carbon (TC) for the GWBC, PLBC and control treatments, respectively, though due to wide variation between replicates this difference was not statistically significant. The cumulative N2O and CH4 emissions were similar between the GWBC and PLBC despite differences in properties of the two biochars. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) analysis and SEM imaging of the composted biochars indicated the presence of iron oxide compounds and amine-NH3 on the surface and pores of the biochars (PLB > GWB). The change in nitrogen (N) functional groups on the biochar surface after composting is evidence for sorption and/or reaction with N from labile organic N, mineral N, and gaseous N (e.g. N2O). The concentration of NH4+ increased during the thermophilic phase and then decreased during the maturation phase, while NO3− accumulated during the maturation phase. Total N retained was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the PLBC (740 g) and the GWBC (660 g) relative to the control (530 g). The TC retained was significantly higher in the GWBC (10.0 kg) and the PLBC (8.5 kg) cf. the control (6.0 kg). Total GHG emissions across the composting period were 50, 63 and 183 kg CO2-eq t−1 of initial mass of GWBC, PLBC and control (dry weight basis) respectively. These results support the co-composting of biochar to lower net emissions of GHGs while increasing N retention (and fertiliser N value) in the mature compost.
- PublicationLowering N2O emissions from soils using eucalypt biochar: the importance of redox reactions(Nature Publishing Group, 2015)
; ; ;Husson, O ;Donne, S ;Mitchell, D ;Munroe, P ;Phelan, D; Van Zwieten, LAgricultural soils are the primary anthropogenic source of atmospheric nitrous oxide (N₂O), contributing to global warming and depletion of stratospheric ozone. Biochar addition has shown potential to lower soil N₂O emission, with the mechanisms remaining unclear. We incubated eucalypt biochar (550°C) - 0, 1 and 5% (w/w) in Ferralsol at 3 water regimes (12, 39 and 54% WFPS) - in a soil column, following gamma irradiation. After N₂O was injected at the base of the soil column, in the 0% biochar control 100% of expected injected N₂O was released into headspace, declining to 67% in the 5% amendment. In a 100% biochar column at 6% WFPS, only 16% of the expected N₂O was observed. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy identified changes in surface functional groups suggesting interactions between N₂O and the biochar surfaces. We have shown increases in -O-C = N /pyridine pyrrole/NH₃, suggesting reactions between N₂O and the carbon (C) matrix upon exposure to N₂O. With increasing rates of biochar application, higher pH adjusted redox potentials were observed at the lower water contents. Evidence suggests that biochar has taken part in redox reactions reducing N₂O to dinitrogen (N₂), in addition to adsorption of N₂O. - PublicationClimate-change and health effects of using rice husk for biocharcompost: Comparing three pyrolysis systems(Elsevier BV, 2017)
;Mohammadi, Ali; ;Anh Mai, Thi Lan ;Brandao, Miguel ;Anaya de la Rosa, Ruy; This study presents a comparative analysis of the environmental impacts of different biochar-compost (COMBI) systems in North Vietnam relative to the conventional practice of open burning of rice husks. Three COMBI systems, using different pyrolysis technologies (pyrolytic cook-stove, brick kiln and the BigChar 2200 unit) for conversion of rice husk into biochar were modelled. Biochar was assumed to be composted with manure and straw, and the biochar-compost produced from each system was assumed to be applied to paddy rice fields. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) showed that the three COMBI systems significantly improved environmental and health impacts of rice husk management in spring and summer compared with open burning, in terms of climate change, particulate matter (PM) and human toxicity (HT) impacts. The differences between the three COMBI systems in the climate change and PM impacts were not significant, possibly due to the large uncertainties. In all systems, the suppression of soil CH4 emissions is the major contributor to the reduced climate effect for the COMBI systems, comprising 56% in spring and 40% in summer. The greatest reduction in the HT impact was offered by the BigChar 2200 system, where biochar is produced in a large-scale plant in which pyrolysis gases are used to generate heat rather than released into the atmosphere. - PublicationBiochar addition in rice farming systems: Economic and energy benefits(Elsevier Ltd, 2017)
;Mohammadi, Ali; ; ; ;Anh Mai, Thi LanThis study investigated economic returns and energy use of alternative rice production systems in North Vietnam with various residue management options. The traditional practice of open burning of rice residues (System A) was compared with the alternative of converting residues to biochar, which was returned to the paddy fields (System B). It was assumed that households used improved cook-stoves and drum ovens to produce biochar, and that the agronomic impacts of biochar compound with increasing biochar applications until reaching maximum benefit at 18 Mg ha⁻1 . This amount of biochar would take eight years to be produced in pyrolytic cook-stoves and drum ovens using the rice residues produced onsite. The net present value (NPV) of producing rice in the two systems was calculated based on their expected streams of costs and benefits. Biochar addition enhanced the NPV of rice by 12% and reduced the non-renewable energy intensity by 27%, relative to System A, after eight years of application. The difference in NPV values between production systems significantly increased to 23% and 71% by crediting GHG emissions abatement in low and high carbon price scenarios, respectively. These findings demonstrate the potential economic benefits of converting rice residues to biochar for soil application. - PublicationBiochar use for climate-change mitigation in rice cropping systems(Elsevier BV, 2016)
;Mohammadi, Ali; ;Anh Mai, Thi Lan ;de la Rosa, Ruy Anaya; ;Brandao, MiguelThis study estimated the climate change effects of alternative rice production systems in North Vietnam with different residue management options, using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The traditional practice of open burning of residues (System A) was compared with the alternative of converting residues to biochar, which was returned to the same land area from which the residues were obtained (System B). Pyrolytic cook-stoves and drum ovens were assumed to be used by households to produce biochar, and the cook-stoves produced heat energy for cooking. The annual rate of biochar applied was determined by the amount of biochar produced from the straw and husk available. We assumed that agronomic effects of biochar increased with each annual biochar application until reaching maximum benefits at 18 Mg ha⁻¹, which takes eight years to be produced in pyrolytic cook-stoves and drum ovens. The largest contributor to the carbon footprint of rice at the mill gate, was CH₄ emissions from soil, in both systems. Biochar addition reduced the carbon footprint of spring rice and summer rice by 26% and 14% respectively, compared with System A, in the first year of application. These values substantially increased to 49% and 38% after eight years of biochar addition. The climate effect of System B was most sensitive to the assumed suppression of soil CH₄ emissions due to biochar application. - PublicationComparative analysis of the microbial communities in agricultural soil amended with enhanced biochars or traditional fertilisers(Elsevier BV, 2014)
;Nielsen, Shaun ;Minchin, Tom ;Kimber, Stephen; ;Gilbert, Jack ;Munroe, Paul; Thomas, TorstenBiochar can have a positive effect on agricultural soils and plant yields. The underlying mechanisms that deliver beneficial outcomes are still poorly understood. Soils contain complex communities of hundreds or thousands of distinct microorganisms, and it has been shown that biochar can have an impact on their composition and function. Here we analyse the microbial communities in a controlled field trial that compared the effect of enhanced biochars (EBs) against a farmer practice (FP) of traditional fertilisation (urea, superphosphate and potash) on sweet corn yield. During sequential crop cycles (barley and sweet corn) two types of EBs were applied at low and high levels (total of 1.1 and 5.44 t ha−1, respectively). Samples were taken at the end of a second crop cycle and over 50,000 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) tag sequences were generated per sample to characterise microbial communities. Despite the lower amounts of nutrients provided by EBs, their amendment to soil produced similar crop yields to the FP. In addition, significant differences in microbial community composition were observed between the high EB and FP treatments. This was driven by differences in the relative abundances of only a few community members. Community level differences were also correlated with a higher soil pH associated with EB laden soil. Network analysis showed that the low EB application had more correlation patterns (co-occurrences and exclusions) between microbial taxa, and highlighted the importance of associations between members of the phyla Acidobacteria and Verrucomicrobia in the biochar environment. Overall, a large number of microorganisms appear to be influenced by EB amendment compared with fertiliser use leading to a complex re-wiring of community composition and associations.