Single step genomic BLUP (SS-GBLUP) for BREEDPLAN beef cattle evaluations is currently being tested for implementation across a number of breeds. A genomic data pipeline has been developed to enable efficient analysis of the industry-recorded SNP genotypes for incorporation in SS-GBLUP analyses. Complex data collection, along with format and/or naming convention inconsistencies challenges efficient data processing. This pipeline includes quality control of variable formatted data, and imputation of genotypes, for building the genomic relationship matrix required for implementation into single step evaluation.

The genetics of reproduction is poorly understood because the heritabilities of traits currently recorded are low. To elucidate the genetics underlying reproduction in beef cattle, we performed a genome-wide association study using the bovine SNP50 chip in 2 tropically adapted beef cattle breeds, Brahman and Tropical Composite. Here we present the results for 3 female reproduction traits: 1) age at puberty, defined as age in days at first observed corpus luteum (CL) after frequent ovarian ultrasound scans (AGECL); 2) the postpartum anestrous interval, measured as the number of days from calving to first ovulation postpartum (first rebreeding interval, PPAI); and 3) the occurrence of the first postpartum ovulation before weaning in the first rebreeding period (PW), defined from PPAI. In addition, correlated traits such as BW, height, serum IGF1 concentration, condition score, and fatness were also examined. In the Brahman and Tropical Composite cattle, 169 [false positive rate (FPR) = 0.262] and 84 (FPR = 0.581) SNP, respectively, were significant (P < 0.001) for AGECL. In Brahman, 41% of these significant markers mapped to a single chromosomal region on BTA14. In Tropical Composites, 16% of these significant markers were located on BTA5. For PPAI, 66 (FPR = 0.67) and 113 (FPR = 0.432) SNP were significant (P < 0.001) in Brahman and Tropical Composite, respectively, whereas for PW, 68 (FPR = 0.64) and 113 (FPR = 0.432) SNP were significant (P < 0.01). In Tropical Composites, the largest concentration of PPAI markers were located on BTA5 [19% (PPAI) and 23% (PW)], and BTA16 [17% (PPAI) and 18% (PW)]. In Brahman cattle, the largest concentration of markers for postpartum anestrus was located on BTA3 (14% for PPAI and PW) and BTA14 (17% PPAI). Very few of the significant markers for female reproduction traits for the Brahman and Tropical Composite breeds were located in the same chromosomal regions. However, fatness and BW traits as well as serum IGF1 concentration were found to be associated with similar genome regions within and between breeds. Clusters of SNP associated with multiple traits were located on BTA14 in Brahman and BTA5 in Tropical Composites.

Genomic selection is rapidly changing dairy breeding but to date it has had little impact on beef cattle breeding. The challenge for beef is to increase the accuracy of genomic predictions, particularly for those traits that cannot be measured on young animals. Accuracies of genomic predictions in beef cattle are low, primarily due to the relatively low number of animals with genotypes and phenotypes that have been used in gene discovery. To improve this will require the collection of genotypes and phenotypes on many more animals. Several key industry initiatives have commenced in Australia aimed at addressing this issue. Also, unlike dairy, the beef industry includes several major breeds and this will likely require the use of very dense SNP chips to enable accurate genomic prediction equations that are predictive across breeds. In Australia genotyping has been performed on all major breeds and research is underway to ascertain the effectiveness of a high density SNP chip (800K) to increase the accuracy of prediction. However, at this stage it is apparent, even in dairy breeding, that genomic information is best combined with traditional pedigree and performance data to generate genomically-enhanced EBVs, thus allowing greater rates of genetic gain through increased accuracies and reduced generation intervals. Several methods exist for combining the two sources of data into current genetic evaluation systems; however challenges exist for the beef industry to implement these effectively. Over time, as the accuracy of genomic selection improves for beef cattle breeding, changes are likely to be needed to the structure of the breeding sector to allow effective use of genomic information for the benefit of the industry.

Opportunities exist in beef cattle breeding to significantly increase the rates of genetic gain by increasing the accuracy of selection at earlier ages. Currently, selection of young beef bulls incorporates several economically important traits but estimated breeding values for these traits have a large range in accuracies. While there is potential to increase accuracy through increased levels of performance recording, several traits cannot be recorded on the young bull. Increasing the accuracy of these traits is where genomic selection can offer substantial improvements in current rates of genetic gain for beef. The immediate challenge for beef is to increase the genetic variation explained by the genomic predictions for those traits of high economic value that have low accuracies at the time of selection. Currently, the accuracies of genomic predictions are low in beef, compared with those in dairy cattle. This is likely to be due to the relatively low number of animals with genotypes and phenotypes that have been used in developing genomic prediction equations. Improving the accuracy of genomic predictions will require the collection of genotypes and phenotypes on many more animals, with even greater numbers needed for lowly heritable traits, such as female reproduction and other fitness traits. Further challenges exist in beef to have genomic predictions for the large number of important breeds and also for multi-breed populations. Results suggest that single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips that are denser than 50 000 SNPs in the current use will be required to achieve this goal. For genomic selection to contribute to genetic progress, the information needs to be correctly combined with traditional pedigree and performance data. Several methods have emerged for combining the two sources of data into current genetic evaluation systems; however, challenges exist for the beef industry to implement these effectively. Changes will also be needed to the structure of the breeding sector to allow optimal use of genomic information for the benefit of the industry. Genomic information will need to be cost effective and a major driver of this will be increasing the accuracy of the predictions, which requires the collection of much more phenotypic data than are currently available.

The temperament of cattle is believed to affect the profitability of the herd through impacting production costs, meat quality, reproduction, maternal behaviour and the welfare of the animals and their handlers. As part of the national beef cattle genetic evaluation in Australia by BREEDPLAN, 50 935 Angus and 50 930 Limousin calves were scored by seedstock producers for temperament using docility score. Docility score is a subjective score of the animal's response to being restrained and isolated within a crush, at weaning, and is scored on a scale from 1 to 5 with 1 representing the quiet and 5 the extremely nervous or anxious calves. Genetic parameters for docility score were estimated using a threshold animal model with four thresholds (five categories) from a Bayesian analysis carried out using Gibbs sampling in THRGIBBS1F90 with post-Gibbs analysis in POSTGIBBSF90. The heritability of docility score on the observed scale was 0.21 and 0.39 in Angus and Limousin, respectively. Since the release of the docility breeding value to the Australian Limousin population there has been a favourable trend within the national herd towards more docile cattle. Weak but favourable genetic correlations between docility score and the production traits indicates that docility score is largely independent of these traits and that selection to improve temperament can occur without having an adverse effect on growth, fat, muscle and reproduction.

Background: The major obstacles for the implementation of genomic selection in Australian beef cattle are the variety of breeds and in general, small numbers of genotyped and phenotyped individuals per breed. The Australian Beef Cooperative Research Center (Beef CRC) investigated these issues by deriving genomic prediction equations (PE) from a training set of animals that covers a range of breeds and crosses including Angus, Murray Grey, Shorthorn, Hereford, Brahman, Belmont Red, Santa Gertrudis and Tropical Composite. This paper presents accuracies of genomically estimated breeding values (GEBV) that were calculated from these PE in the commercial pure-breed beef cattle seed stock sector. Methods: PE derived by the Beef CRC from multi-breed and pure-breed training populations were applied to genotyped Angus, Limousin and Brahman sires and young animals, but with no pure-breed Limousin in the training population. The accuracy of the resulting GEBV was assessed by their genetic correlation to their phenotypic target trait in a bi-variate REML approach that models GEBV as trait observations. Results: Accuracies of most GEBV for Angus and Brahman were between 0.1 and 0.4, with accuracies for abattoir carcass traits generally greater than for live animal body composition traits and reproduction traits. Estimated accuracies greater than 0.5 were only observed for Brahman abattoir carcass traits and for Angus carcass rib fat. Averaged across traits within breeds, accuracies of GEBV were highest when PE from the pooled across-breed training population were used. However, for the Angus and Brahman breeds the difference in accuracy from using pure-breed PE was small. For the Limousin breed no reasonable results could be achieved for any trait. Conclusion: Although accuracies were generally low compared to published accuracies estimated within breeds, they are in line with those derived in other multi-breed populations. Thus PE developed by the Beef CRC can contribute to the implementation of genomic selection in Australian beef cattle breeding.

Data on Angus (ANG), Charolais (CHA), Hereford (HER), Limousin (LIM) and Simmental (SIM) cattle were used to estimate genetic parameters for calving difficulty (CD), birthweight (BWT) and gestation length (GL) using threshold-linear models and to examine the effect of inclusion of random effect of sire x herd interaction (SxH) in the models. ... Genetic parameters obtained for BWT, GL and CD, by fitting SxH as an additional random effect, are more appropriate to use in the genetic evaluation of calving ease in BREEDPLAN.

Genomic information has the potential to change the way beef cattle and sheep are selected and to substantially increase genetic gains. Ideally, genomic data will be used in combination with pedigree and phenotypic data to increase the accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBVs) and selection indexes. The first example of this in Australia was the integration of four markers for tenderness into beef cattle breeding values. Subsequently, the availability of high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels has made selection using genomic information possible, while at the same time creating significant challenges for genetic evaluation with regard to both data management and statistical modelling. Reference populations have been established in both the beef cattle and sheep industries, in which an extensive range of phenotypes have been collected and animals genotyped mainly using 50K SNP panels. From this information, genomic predictions of breeding value have been developed, albeit with varying levels of accuracy. These predictions have been incorporated into routine genetic evaluations using three approaches and trial results are now available to breeders. In the first, genomic predictions have been included in genetic evaluation models as additional traits. The challenges with this method have been the construction of consistent genetic covariance matrices, and a significant increase in computing time. The second approach has been to use a selection index procedure to blend genomic predictions with existing EBVs. This method has been shown to produce very similar results, and has the advantage of being simple to implement and fast to operate, although consistent genetic covariance matrices are still required. Third, in sheep a single-step analysis combining a genomic relationship matrix with a standard pedigree-based relationship matrix has been used to estimate breeding values for carcass and eating-quality traits. It is likely that this procedure or one similar will be incorporated into routine evaluations in the near future. While significant progress has been made in implementing methods of integrating genomic information in both beef and sheep evaluations in Australia, the major challenges for the future will be to continue to collect the phenotypes needed to derive accurate genomic predictions, and in managing much larger volumes of genomic data as the number of animals genotyped and the density of markers increase.

The usefulness of genomic selection was assessed for female reproduction in tropically adapted breeds in northern Australia. Records from experimental populations of Brahman (996) and Tropical Composite (1097) cattle that had had six calving opportunities were used to derive genomic predictions for several measures of female fertility. These measures included age at first corpus luteum (AGECL), at first calving and subsequent postpartum anoestrous interval and measures of early and lifetime numbers of calves born or weaned. In a second population, data on pregnancy and following status (anoestrous or pregnancy) were collected from 27 commercial herds from northern Australia to validate genomic predictions. Cows were genotyped with a variety of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels and, where necessary, genotypes imputed to the highest density (729 068 SNPs). Genetic parameters of subsets of the complete data were estimated. These subsets were used to validate genomic predictions using genomic best linear unbiased prediction using both univariate cross-validation and bivariate analyses. Estimated heritability ranged from 0.56 for AGECL to 0.03 for lifetime average calving rate in the experimental cows, and from 0.09 to 0.25 for early life reproduction traits in the commercial cows. Accuracies of predictions were generally low, reflecting the limited number of data in the experimental populations. For AGECL and postpartum anoestrous interval, the highest accuracy was 0.35 for experimental Brahman cows using five-fold univariate cross-validation. Greater genetic complexity in the Tropical Composite cows resulted in the corresponding accuracy of 0.23 for AGECL. Similar level of accuracies (from univariate and bivariate analyses) were found for some of the early measures of female reproduction in commercial cows, indicating that there is potential for genomic selection but it is limited by the number of animals with phenotypes.

Genomic selection in the Australian beef cattle sector is challenged by the variety of small breeds and a low number of phenotyped and genotyped individuals in each breed. The Beef Cooperative Research Center (Beef CRC) derived prediction equations (PE) on mixed-breed and pure-breed training sets. This paper presents the accuracy of the resulting genomically estimated breeding values (GEBV) assessed by their genetic correlation to their phenotypic target trait recorded in the seed-stock cattle populations of Australian Angus and Brahman. Accuracies of the majority of GEBVs was between 0.1 and 0.4, and were highest when the PE of the pooled across-breed training population were used. The difference in accuracies from using pure-breed PEs were small. Results were generally low compared to accuracies estimated within breeds, but in line with those derived in other across-breed populations. Thus prediction equations derived by the Beef CRC can contribute to the implementation of genomic selection in Australian beef cattle breeding.