Review of Huhtamo, Erkki, 'Illusions in Motion: Media Archaeology of the Moving Panorama and Related Spectacles', MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2013, ISBN 9 7802 6201 8517, 456 pp., US$45.00. Distributor: Footprint Books
On the face of it, 'Illusions in Motion' might seem a niche publication, lavishly illustrated - often from the author's own vast collection of ephemera, commercial apparatuses and toys - and designed to appeal primarily to specialists of an obscure mid-nineteenth-century media technology and entertainment: the moving panorama. It would be a mistake to read the book in this way. As one of the leading proponents of media archaeology, Erkki Huhtamo's achievement is not only to recuperate the forgotten moving panorama to media history, but also to demonstrate how it offers innovative insights into the historical formation of media culture.
Breaking it down, building it up: A research exercise for first-year media studies students
How can we introduce first-year students to the skills, procedures, complexities, and pleasures of research in a relatively new interdisciplinary field like media studies? We faced this question-condensed in this dossier's main title 'Beyond Google'-in developing the introductory media studies course that provides the example for this essay. On its own, the phrase 'research skills' has the potential to be interpreted narrowly and reductively. We approached teaching research skills in our introductory media studies course in an enlarged humanistic sense, thinking of 'humanistic' as a placeholder for a bundle of thinking processes and skills, and related techniques of analysis, argument, interpretation, and inquiry. Across the course, learning activities and assessments were designed according to three main ideas or principles. First, as already indicated, research skills comprise interrelated cognitive thinking and research-related capacities, including the ability to read, analyze, describe, and articulate concepts through writing. As we'll explain shortly, this idea led us to teach research skills by disaggregating them initially, in order to help students explore the role each plays, in its own right, and in turn how they work together. Second, what are often referred to as generic research procedures need to be integrated with disciplinary learning. In this regard, strategies for searching, documenting, and organizing sources support interpretation and analysis of what constitutes scholarly writing or argument, and show the value of these procedures for studying substantive topics in media studies. Third, developing opportunities for students to reflect and build on their existing media experience and know-how, while negotiating new concepts and approaches, provides a bridge into disciplinary ways of thinking and working.