A panting score index for sheep
When exposed to hot conditions, heat dissipation via an increase in respiration rate (RR) is an important thermoregulatory mechanism for sheep. However, evaluating RR under field conditions is difficult. In cattle, a viable alternative has been to assess panting score (PS)" therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between RR and PS to determine if a PS index can be used to evaluate heat load in sheep. One hundred and forty-four Merino wethers (44.02 ± 0.32 kg) were used within a climate-controlled study. The study was replicated twice over 29 days, where each replicate consisted of two treatments: (1) thermoneutral (TN) and (2) hot (HOT). Ambient temperature (TA) and relative humidity (RH) were maintained between 18 and 20 °C and 60 and 70% respectively for the TN treatment. For the HOT treatment, heat load increased steadily over the 29 days. Minimum TA was 22.5 °C and maximum was 38.5 °C, while RH decreased (60 to 30%) as TA increased in the HOT treatment. A comprehensive PS classification was developed by enhancing the current sheep PS index and aligning the descriptors with the current PS index utilized in beef cattle studies. Respiration rate and PS were obtained for each animal at 3-h intervals between 0800 h and 1700 h daily. These data were used to determine the mean RR for each PS, across the study and within the TN and HOT treatments. The relationship between PS and RR was evaluated using a Pearson's correlation coefficient. Data were also analyzed using a general linear model to determine the impact of PS, posture and animal identification (animal ID) on RR within each PS. Unsurprisingly, RR increased as PS increased, and PS, 0 and RR, 2.5 were 30.7 ± 0.59 and 246.8 ± 12.20 bpm respectively. There was a strong relationship between RR and PS (r = 0.71" P < 0.0001). As RR increased, sheep were more likely to be observed standing (P < 0.001). Mean PS of sheep within the HOT treatment (1.49 ± 0.02) were greater (P = 0.0085) when compared to the TN (1.17 ± 0.02) sheep. Individual animal ID accounted for approximately 7–37% of the variation observed for RR across PS, indicating that animal ID and climatic conditions were influencing RR and PS. These results suggest that the comprehensive PS index described here can be used as a visual appraisal of the heat load status of sheep.
The influence of heat load on Merino sheep. 1. Growth, performance, behaviour and climate
Context. Annually, millions of sheep are exported from Australia to the Middle East, typically during the southern hemisphere winter to the northern hemisphere summer. During these voyages, sheep can be exposed to relatively rapid changes in ambient conditions within a short period of time (≤29 days); therefore, excessive heat load concerns can arise.
Aims. The aim of this study was to define the responses of sheep to incremental heat load under simulated live export conditions. The study herein describes (1) the heat load imposed, and (2) the effect of this heat load on the growth, performance and behavioural responses of sheep during periods of incremental heat load.
Methods. A total of 144 Merino wethers (44.02 ± 0.32 kg) were included in a 29-day climate controlled study using two cohorts of 72 sheep (n = 2), exposed to two treatments: (1) thermoneutral and (2) hot (HOT). Ambient temperature (°C) and relative humidity (%) for the HOT treatment were modelled from live export voyages from Australia to the Middle East in July. Climatic conditions within the climate control chambers were recorded at 10-min intervals, then used to calculate a temperature humidity index. Sheep posture, rumination, eating, drinking and demeanour (calm, agitated or depressed) were observed four times daily at 3-h intervals between 0800 hours and 1700 hours. Feed intake was recorded daily and water intake was measured using an automated meter. Sheep were weighed on Day 0 and then at 7-day intervals. Sheep were weighed at slaughter and carcass weights were obtained, these data were used to determine carcass dressing percentage. Data were analysed using a repeated measures model, with a compound symmetry covariance structure.
Key results. Climatic conditions in the HOT treatment increased incrementally between Day 1 (temperature humidity index ≥19) and Day 29 (temperature humidity index ≤34.7). Behaviour, feed intake, average daily gain (g/day), carcass weight (kg) and dressing percentage were not influenced by treatment (P > 0.05). Sheep in the HOT treatment group showed a 137% increase in water intake (P < 0.01) and on average consumed 2.15 L/sheep.day, whereas the thermoneutral group consumed 1.67 L/sheep.day.
Conclusions. These results suggest that these sheep were capable of maintaining feed intake and growth despite exposure to heat load, albeit with a 137% increase in water intake.
Implications. These results highlight the resilience of the Australian Merino genotype, as these sheep were capable of maintaining feed intake and growth during exposure to heat load. As the climatic conditions in this study were modelled based on typical live export vessel conditions, these results may suggest that the climatic conditions experienced by sheep during voyages may not be as critical as previously thought.
The influence of heat load on Merino sheep. 2. Body temperature, wool surface temperature and respiratory dynamics
Context. Australia exports ~2 million sheep annually. On these voyages, sheep can be exposed to rapidly changing ambient conditions within a short time, and sheep may be exposed to periods of excessive heat load.
Aims. The aim of this study was to define the responses of sheep exposed to incremental heat load under simulated live export conditions. The study herein describes the influence of heat load on wool surface temperature, body temperature (rumen temperature (TRUM), °C; and rectal temperature (TREC), °C) and respiratory dynamics (respiration rate, breaths/min; and panting score (PS)) of sheep under live export conditions. In addition, the relationship between body temperature and respiratory dynamics was investigated.
Methods. A total of 144 Merino wethers (44.02 ± 0.32 kg) were used in a 29-day climate controlled study using two cohorts of 72 sheep (n = 2), exposed to two treatments: (1) thermoneutral (TN; ambient temperature was maintained between 18°C and 20°C), and (2) hot (HOT; ambient temperature minimum and maximum were 22.5°C and 38.5°C respectively). Sheep in the HOT treatment were exposed to heat load simulated from live export voyages from Australia
to the Middle East. Respiration rate, PS and wool surface temperature (°C) data were collected four times daily, at 3-h intervals between 0800 hours and 1700 hours. Rectal temperatures were collected on five occasions at 7-day intervals. These data were evaluated using a repeated measures model, assuming a compound symmetry covariance structure. Individual TRUM were obtained via rumen boluses at 10-min intervals between Days 23 and 29 of Cohort 2. Individual TRUM data were collated and converted to an hourly mean TRUM for each sheep, these data were then used to determine the hourly mean TRUM for TN and HOT, then analysed using a first order autoregressive repeated measures model. Additionally, the relationship between respiratory dynamics and TRUM were investigated using a Pearson’s correlation coefficient, a partial correlation coefficient and a multivariate analysis of variance.
Key results. The respiration rate of the HOT sheep (140 ± 3.55 breaths/min) was greater (P < 0.01) than that of the TN sheep (75 ± 3.55 breaths/min). Similarly, the PS of the HOT (1.5 ± 0.02) sheep was greater (P = 0.009) compared with the TN sheep (1.2 ± 0.02). Wool surface temperatures and TREC were greater (P < 0.05) for the HOT sheep than for the TN sheep. There were treatment (P < 0.0001), hour (P < 0.0001), day (P = 0.038) and treatment · hour (P < 0.0001) effects on the TRUM of TN and HOT sheep.
Conclusions. The climatic conditions imposed within the HOT treatment were sufficient to disrupt the thermal equilibrium of these sheep, resulting in increased respiration rate, PS, TREC and TRUM.
Implications. These results suggest that the sheep were unable to completely compensate for the imposed heat load via respiration, thus resulting in an increase in TREC and TRUM.