Options
Saunders, Manu
Loading...
Given Name
Manu
Manu
Surname
Saunders
UNE Researcher ID
une-id:msaund28
Email
msaund28@une.edu.au
Preferred Given Name
Manu
School/Department
School of Environmental and Rural Science
2 results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- PublicationIntroduction and establishment of Carvalhotingis visenda (Hemiptera: Tingidae) as a biological control agent for cat's claw creeper Macfadyena unguis-cati (Bignoniaceae) in Australia(Academic Press, 2010)
;Dhileepan, K ;Trevino, M ;Bayliss, D; ;Shortus, M ;McCarthy, J ;Snow, E LWalter, G HCarvalhotingis visenda (Hemiptera: Tingidae) is the first biological control agent approved for release against cat's claw creeper Macfadyena unguis-cati (Bignoniaceae) in Australia. The mass-rearing and field releases of C. visenda commenced in May 2007 and since then more than half a million individuals have been released at 72 sites in Queensland and New South Wales. In addition, community groups have released over 11,000 tingid-infested potted cat's claw creeper plants at 63 sites in Queensland. Establishment of C. visenda was evident at 80% of the release sites after three years. The tingid established on the two morphologically distinct 'long-pod' and 'short-pod' cat's claw creeper varieties present in Australia. Establishment was more at sites that received three or more field releases (83%) than at sites that received two or less releases (73%); and also at sites that received more than 5000 individuals (82%) than at sites that received less than 5000 individuals (68%). In the field, the tingid spread slowly (5.4 m per year), and the maximum distance of C. visenda incidence away from the initial release points ranged from 6 m to approximately 1 km. - PublicationLetters: Bee conservation: Key role of managed bees(American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2018)
; ; In their Perspective "Conserving honey bees does not help wildlife" (26 January, p. 392), J. Geldmann and J. P. González-Varo argue that because managed honey bees are an agricultural animal, their crop pollination does not fit the definition of an ecosystem service. This distinction, the authors suggest, is a key step to wild pollinator conservation. This argument highlights a fundamental misinterpretation of the ecology of ecosystem services: Services are delivered to beneficiaries through ecological processes and interactions, not by organisms alone.