This dataset is based on series of three studies conducted as part of a PhD thesis for the award of Doctor of Philosophy (Clinical Psychology). The thesis investigated the relationship between early maladaptive schemas (EMS) from the schema therapy model and their relationship with interpersonal problems. The dataset for study one is based on a metaanalysis investigating the correlations between early maladaptive schemas and measures of interpersonal relationship problems from the available research as systematically reviewed in 2019. The remaining two datasets were sampled from a first-year psychology student participant pool at the University of New England. The dataset from study two is based on a repeated measures experiment which assessed participant responses and EMS scores following a series of interpersonal vignettes depicting acceptance, ambiguous rejection and rejection. The responses from study two included measures of perceived emotional distress and negative cognitions measured quantitatively and a series of written actions coded qualitatively using inductive content analysis. The dataset from study three consists of crosssectional survey data including measures for EMSs, cognitive emotion regulation strategies, trait-mindfulness and trait-tendencies for problematic interpersonal behaviour patterns. Together these datasets found support for a link between EMSs and low trait-mindfulness, increased emotional distress, negative cognitions and trait-tendencies for problematic interpersonal behaviour patterns.

Background

Early maladaptive schemas (EMSs) have been theorised to contribute to reoccurring interpersonal problems. This study developed a novel experimental paradigm that aimed to assess if EMSs moderate the impact of interpersonal situations on interpersonal responses by manipulating the degree of rejection in a series of interpersonal vignettes depicting acceptance, ambiguous rejection and rejection.

Method

In a sample of 158 first-year psychology students (27.2% male; 72.2% female; 0.6% other) participant responses to interpersonal scenarios were measured including degree of perceived rejection, emotional distress, conviction in varying cognitive appraisals consistent with attribution theory and behavioural responses to scenarios. Qualitative data was analysed using inductive content analysis and statistical analyses were conducted using multilevel mixed effect linear and logistic regression models using the software Jamovi.

Results

People reporting higher EMSs reported increased emotional distress (F(1, 156) = 24.85, p < .001), perceptions of rejection (F(1, 156) = 34.33, p < .001), self-blame (F(1, 156) = 53.25, p < .001), other-blame (F(1, 156) = 13.16, p < .001) and more intentional (F(1, 156) = 9.24, p = .003), stable (F(1, 156) = 25.22, p < .001) and global (F(1, 156) = 19.55, p < .001) attributions but no differences in reported behavioural responses. The results also supported that EMSs moderate the relationship between interpersonal rejection and perceptions of rejection (F(2, 1252) = 18.43, p < .001), emotional distress (F(2, 1252) = 12.64, p < .001) and self-blame (F(2, 1252) = 14.00, p < .001).

Conclusion

Together these findings suggest that people with EMSs experience increased distress and select negative cognitions in situations where there are higher levels of rejection but that distress and negative cognitions are generally higher in people with EMSs irrespective of the situation.