Lippia ('Phyla canescens', Verbenaceae) is an invasive perennial forb from South America that is now widespread throughout the Murray Darling Basin in Australia, threatening the biological values of internationally significant wetlands (Ramsar sites) and the productivity of the grazing industry (Earl 2003). In the Gwydir Wetlands in north western NSW, the spread of Lippia has been associated with large and widespread flooding that occurred in the late 1990s (McCosker 1998). Lippia dominance is believed to be favoured by the altered flood regimes associated with river regulation, namely a reduction in the frequency and duration of flooding. Studies have found Lippia to occur in infrequently flooded sites (Blanch et al. 1999; Mawhinney 2003) and at higher elevations in the floodplain (Blanch et al. 2000). Glasshouse studies have found that Lippia growth is stunted at inundation depths of 20 cm, although no mortality was reported (McCosker 1994; Hobson 1999). This has lead to a widespread belief that restoration of a more 'natural' flood regime may assist in Lippia control. However, few data are available to support this notion.

'Phyla canescens' (Verbenaceae, hereafter lippia) is an invasive perennial forb from South America that is now widespread in Australia, threatening the biological values of internationally significant wetlands (Ramsar listed) and the productivity of the grazing industry (Crawford 2008; Earl 2003). Under certain conditions, lippia can displace native herbaceous vegetation and form mono-specific stands, but little is known about the process of colonization and early invasion. Lippia has a dual reproductive strategy, recruiting via seedlings and vegetative fragments in periods following inundation (Macdonald 2008). Determining the relative contribution of vegetative and sexual reproduction for lippia across environmental gradients is important for management action - if spread is primarily by vegetative fragments then control efforts should be focussed on managing vectors (e.g. movement of stock and vehicles), whereas if spread is mostly by seeds then management should focus on reducing the conditions favourable to seed production and seedling establishment. The predominant reproductive mode also has implications for the selection of biocontrol agents.

Dominance of invasive species is often assumed to be due to a superior ability to acquire resources. However, dominance in plant communities can arise through multiple interacting mechanisms, including disturbance. Inter-specific competition can be strongly affected by abiotic conditions, which can determine the outcome of competitive interactions. We evaluated competition and disturbance as mechanisms governing dominance of 'Phyla canescens' (hereafter lippia), an invasive perennial forb from South America, in 'Paspalum distichum' (perennial grass, hereafter water couch) meadows in floodplain wetlands of eastern Australia. Water couch meadows (in the study area) are listed under the Ramsar Convention due to their significance as habitat for migratory waterbirds. In the field, we monitored patterns of vegetation boundaries between the two species in response to flooding. Under controlled glasshouse conditions, we explored competitive interactions between the native water couch and lippia subject to different soil moisture/inundation regimes. We did this using a pairwise factorial glasshouse experiment that manipulated neighbor density (9 treatments) and soil moisture/inundation (4 treatments). In the field trial, inundation increased the cover of water couch. Under more controlled conditions, the invader had a competitive effect on the native species only under dry soil conditions, and was strongly inhibited by inundation. This suggests that dry conditions favor the growth of the invader and wetter (more historical) conditions favor the native grass. In this system, invader dominance is governed by altered disturbance regimes which give the invader a competitive advantage over the native species.

This study examined if one grazing strategy (namely seasonal rest) was effective in the control of the invasive forb 'Phyla canescens' (Kunth) Greene (hereafter lippia). We examined if rest from grazing could increase the competitiveness of native palatable species by allowing time to recover from defoliation, thereby altering competitive interactions between native species and lippia. In a field trial, we manipulated cattle grazing to determine its effects on the biomass of lippia and native species. We compared rest from grazing at different times of the year with year-long grazing (low intensity continuous and high intensity short duration) and no grazing (permanently excluding large grazing animals). Experimental plots were stratified into different hydrological areas (approximately annual flooding and flooded less than once every 5 years) to include flood dynamics in the management scenarios. We detected no negative impacts of seasonal rest on lippia, but some positive effects on native species. We found that complete exclusion from grazing in areas that already have substantial lippia invasion (and no flooding) may actually favour the expansion of lippia (at certain times). This study does not suggest that grazing management cannot be used as a tool for lippia control - simply that seasonal resting had no effect over a 3-year period. This is likely due to the dynamics of a boom-and-bust landscape in which if the abiotic conditions are not suitable for growth, then native species will not grow whether grazed or rested.

1. Characterization of the seed bank is one of the most important demographic assessments that can be undertaken for a plant community. Overlapping generations, evidence of past above-ground vegetation and histories of invasion and disturbance are recorded in the seed bank. 2. Two broad approaches have been used to elucidate seed bank components - sifting-sorting techniques and germinability assays. The utility of these approaches varies with community type and habitat although a common theme among studies has been the quest for an efficacious method. Here, we compare the two approaches for semi-arid ephemeral wetlands: seed extraction through flotation and seedling emergence. 3. Species composition of the soil seed bank differed dramatically depending on the technique, with only 19 species common to both methods and a total of 66 species detected using both procedures. 4. Both techniques provided similar estimates of seed density and species richness of the seed bank in the top 5 cm of soil. However, samples collected from 5 cm to 20 cm had lower seed densities using the flotation technique than with the seedling emergence technique. 5. Differences in seed detectability between the two approaches may be related to seed size, seed dormancy and specific germination requirements. 6. The community composition of soil seed banks for ephemeral wetlands depends on the choice of technique.