Options
Sriprakash, Sri Kadaba
In Search of the Holy Grail: A Specific Diagnostic Test for Rheumatic Fever
2021-05-14, McMillan, David J, Rafeek, Rukshan A M, Norton, Robert E, Good, Michael F, Sriprakash, Kadaba S, Ketheesan, Natkunam
Current diagnosis of Acute Rheumatic Fever and Rheumatic Heart Disease (ARF/RHD) relies on a battery of clinical observations aided by technologically advanced diagnostic tools and non-specific laboratory tests. The laboratory-based assays fall into two categories: those that (1) detect "evidence of preceding streptococcal infections" (ASOT, anti-DNAse B, isolation of the Group A Streptococcus from a throat swab) and (2) those that detect an ongoing inflammatory process (ESR and CRP). These laboratory tests are positive during any streptococcal infection and are non-specific for the diagnosis of ARF/RHD. Over the last few decades, we have accumulated considerable knowledge about streptococcal biology and the immunopathological mechanisms that contribute to the development, progression and exacerbation of ARF/RHD. Although our knowledge is incomplete and many more years will be devoted to understanding the exact molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in the spectrum of clinical manifestations of ARF/RHD, in this commentary we contend that there is sufficient understanding of the disease process that using currently available technologies it is possible to identify pathogen associated peptides and develop a specific test for ARF/RHD. It is our view that with collaboration and sharing of well-characterised serial blood samples from patients with ARF/RHD from different regions, antibody array technology and/or T-cell tetramers could be used to identify streptococcal peptides specific to ARF/RHD. The availability of an appropriate animal model for this uniquely human disease can further facilitate the determination as to whether these peptides are pathognomonic. Identification of such peptides will also facilitate testing of potential anti-streptococcal vaccines for safety and avoid potential candidates that may pre-dispose potential vaccine recipients to adverse outcomes. Such peptides can also be readily incorporated into a universally affordable point of care device for both primary and tertiary care.
A longitudinal study of antibody responses to selected host antigens in rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease
2021, Surve, Nuzhat Z, Kerkar, Prafulla G, Deshmukh, Chandrahas T, Nadkar, Milind Y, Mehta, Preeti R, Ketheesan, Natkunam, Sriprakash, Kadaba S, Karmarkar, Mohan G
Introduction. Group A streptococci can trigger autoimmune responses that lead to acute rheumatic fever (ARF) and rheumatic heart disease (RHD).
Gap Statement. Some autoantibodies generated in ARF/RHD target antigens in the S2 subfragment region of cardiac myosin. However, little is known about the kinetics of these antibodies during the disease process.
Aim. To determine the antibody responses over time in patients and healthy controls against host tissue proteins - cardiac myosin and peptides from its S2 subfragment, tropomyosin, laminin and keratin.
Methodology. We used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to determine antibody responses in: (1) healthy controls; (2) patients with streptococcal pharyngitis; (3) patients with ARF with carditis and (4) patients with RHD on penicillin prophylaxis.
Results. We observed significantly higher antibody responses against extracellular proteins - laminin and keratin in pharyngitis group, patients with ARF and patients with RHD when compared to healthy controls. The antibody responses against intracellular proteins - cardiac myosin and tropomyosin were elevated only in the group of patients with ARF with active carditis. While the reactivity to S2 peptides S2-1-3, 8-11, 14, 16-18, 21-22 and 32 was higher in patients with ARF, the reactivity in the RHD group was high only against S2-1, 9, 11, 12 when compared to healthy controls. The reactivity against S2 peptides reduced as the disease condition stabilized in the ARF group whereas the reactivity remained unaltered in the RHD group. By contrast antibodies against laminin and keratin persisted in patients with RHD.
Conclusion. Our findings of antibody responses against host proteins support the multistep hypothesis in the development of rheumatic carditis. The differential kinetics of serum antibody responses against S2 peptides may have potential use as markers of ongoing cardiac damage that can be used to monitor patients with ARF/RHD.