A handful of studies have examined the relationship between schedules of reinforcement and behavioural variability, with mixed results. The present study compares a greater range of schedules, examining the effects on location variability. Hens worked in an operant chamber containing five, horizontally arranged and active response keys. Experiment 1 compared eight schedules: FR 40, FR 10, FI (yoked FR 40), FI (yoked FR 10), VR 40, VR 10, VI (yoked VR 40) and VI (yoked VI 10). Experiment 2 compared a series of DRL schedules: 0.5 s to DRL 19.2 s, incrementing in step sizes of 20%. Location variability was measured as the percentage of switching across keys from within trials, between trials (switching from the reinforced response location to the first response location of the following trial), and the number of keys used. Results from Experiment 1 suggested no relation between schedules and location variability. However a relation between response rate and location variability was found; faster response rates resulted in less variability. Experiment 2, in attempt to control for response rate, found no relation between response rate and location variability. Switches within trials occurred more frequently in Experiment 2 than in Experiment 1, an aspect that needs further examination.