This project investigates the nature and extent of educational inequalities or injustices that manifest in academic language testing evaluation regimes. The focus is on Fiji, a multilingual, multicultural country situated in the South Pacific. The major languages spoken in the country are Fijian (iTaukei), English, and Fiji Hindi. Other languages spoken in the community include Gujarati, Punjabi, Urdu, Telugu, Tamil, Mandarin, and Cantonese. Due to the colonial history of Fiji, English has emerged as the main lingua franca among the various ethnolinguistic groups in the country. English is also the sole medium of instruction at all three universities in the country. The dominance of English in the context of tertiary education results in a sociocultural problem when students enter universities in Fiji from a variety of high school backgrounds. Some come from urban or semi-urban high schools, while others come from rural high schools, which are located in the interior of the country and on smaller islands. Depending on the school, students may acquire different levels of English proficiency, which may leave them ill-equipped for university study. This situation directly draws attention to educational inequalities that students face at the tertiary level due to the variable levels of English language skills provided to them at the primary and secondary levels.

Drawing on the review of the relevant literature and ethnographic research, this study uses grounded theory methodologies to gain insight into the underlying educational inequalities and injustices emanating from lack of epistemic access for those university students with inadequate English language skills. To this end, the study analyses the level of difference in writing abilities at the beginning and end of the first-year of study. The findings and conclusions from this study hold key insights for informing ongoing efforts towards ameliorating educational inequalities in Fiji. The study was conducted at a university in Fiji. The first-year enrolment number was 400 students. One hundred and twenty students (30% of the student cohort) were sampled at the beginning of the first year and at the end of their first year of university program. The same cohort of 120 students was tracked throughout the project, out of which 30 students were interviewed at the end of the first year to assess the writing interventions and to gauge the nature and extent of educational inequalities faced by the participants. The interviews were analysed using grounded theory methodology to generate themes from raw data.

The study uses the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) to evaluate student writing skills. The CEFR is one of the most comprehensive frameworks for language evaluation prevalent today, and has been widely used by language testing organisations in Western countries. However, since its introduction in Europe in 2001, the CEFR has so far not been applied to the unique sociolinguistic context of the South Pacific. This study is the first to do so, and gauges the framework's relevance and usefulness in a non-European multilingual context.

The outcomes of this research make significant contributions in informing policy discourse on reversing educational inequalities at the tertiary level. Firstly, it reaffirms the CEFR's capability in successfully gauging students' preparedness for English-language university study and work life. Secondly, it attests to the CEFR's suitability for use in the intensely multilingual (or plurilingual) South Pacific context. Most importantly, the study identifies four specific indicators of educational inequalities that Fijian students in higher education encounter from primary school through to high school and university that hinder the development of adequate academic English language skills. These include: (i) lack of teaching and learning resources, (ii) language barriers, (iii) problems with the medium of instruction, and (iv) shortage of experienced teachers. Although these indicators of educational inequalities are reported in comparable studies from other parts of the world, they are significant findings for this study, not least because the South Pacific is a geographical locale where individual nation-states such as Fiji consist of several islands with unique socio-cultural formations and complex linguistic landscapes.

The methodological contributions and the unique data set of the study will advance scholarly and social policy conversations on this topic. Through analysing the rich narrative stories of research participants and qualitative data, the study makes an original contribution to the body of knowledge on how grounded theory research methodologies can be applied to a longitudinal language testing research context. At present, language testing in higher education relies on data from conventional formative and normative assessments. Approaches such as grounded theory and longitudinal research design have rarely been used in intensely multilingual contexts such as the South Pacific. The findings of this study hold promise in informing higher education policies for improving support systems to enhance the smooth transition of multilingual students from high school through to university and into the workforce.