Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Publication
    Mechanical evidence that 'Australopithecus sediba' was limited in its ability to eat hard foods
    (Nature Publishing Group, 2016) ;
    Smith, Amanda L
    ;
    Richmond, Brian G
    ;
    Wright, Barth W
    ;
    Wang, Qian
    ;
    Byron, Craig
    ;
    Carlson, Kristian J
    ;
    de Ruiter, Darryl J
    ;
    Berger, Lee R
    ;
    Tamvada, Kelli
    ;
    Pryor, Leslie C
    ;
    Berthaume, Michael A
    ;
    Benazzi, Stefano
    ;
    Strait, David S
    ;
    Weber, Gerhard W
    ;
    Spencer, Mark A
    ;
    Carlson, Keely B
    ;
    McNulty, Kieran P
    ;
    Dechow, Paul C
    ;
    Grosse, Ian R
    ;
    Ross, Callum F
    'Australopithecus sediba' has been hypothesized to be a close relative of the genus 'Homo'. Here we show that MH1, the type specimen of 'A. sediba', was not optimized to produce high molar bite force and appears to have been limited in its ability to consume foods that were mechanically challenging to eat. Dental microwear data have previously been interpreted as indicating that 'A. sediba' consumed hard foods, so our findings illustrate that mechanical data are essential if one aims to reconstruct a relatively complete picture of feeding adaptations in extinct hominins. An implication of our study is that the key to understanding the origin of 'Homo' lies in understanding how environmental changes disrupted gracile australopith niches. Resulting selection pressures led to changes in diet and dietary adaption that set the stage for the emergence of our genus.
  • Publication
    Homo sapiens and Neanderthals share high cerebral cortex integration into adulthood
    (Nature Publishing Group, 2023) ;
    Profico, Antonio
    ;
    ;
    Allen, Kari
    ;
    ; ;
    Mitchell, Dave Rex
    ;
    Mondanaro, Alessandro
    ;
    Melchionna, Marina
    ;
    Castiglione, Silvia
    ;
    Serio, Carmela
    ;
    Raia, Pasquale

    There is controversy around the mechanisms that guided the change in brain shape during the evolution of modern humans. It has long been held that different cortical areas evolved independently from each other to develop their unique functional specializations. However, some recent studies suggest that high integration between different cortical areas could facilitate the emergence of equally extreme, highly specialized brain functions. Here, we analyse the evolution of brain shape in primates using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics of endocasts. We aim to determine, firstly, whether modern humans present unique developmental patterns of covariation between brain cortical areas; and secondly, whether hominins experienced unusually high rates of evolution in brain covariation as compared to other primates. On the basis of analyses including modern humans and other extant great apes at different developmental stages, we first demonstrate that, unlike our closest living relatives, Homo sapiens retain high levels of covariation between cortical areas into adulthood. Among the other great apes, high levels of covariation are only found in immature individuals. Secondly, at the macro-evolutionary level, our analysis of 400 endocasts, representing 148 extant primate species and 6 fossil hominins, shows that strong covariation between different areas of the brain in H. sapiens and Homo neanderthalensis evolved under distinctly higher evolutionary rates than in any other primate, suggesting that natural selection favoured a greatly integrated brain in both species. These results hold when extinct species are excluded and allometric effects are accounted for. Our findings demonstrate that high covariation in the brain may have played a critical role in the evolution of unique cognitive capacities and complex behaviours in both modern humans and Neanderthals.

  • Publication
    Review of 'In Vivo' Bone Strain Studies and Finite Element Models of the Zygomatic Complex in Humans and Nonhuman Primates: Implications for Clinical Research and Practice
    (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2016)
    Prado, Felippe Bevilacqua
    ;
    Freire, Alexandre Rodrigues
    ;
    Rossi, Ana Claudia
    ;
    ;
    Smith, Amanda L
    ;
    Dechow, Paul C
    ;
    Strait, David S
    ;
    Voigt, Tilman
    ;
    Ross, Callum F
    The craniofacial skeleton is often described in the clinical literature as being comprised of vertical bony pillars, which transmit forces from the toothrow to the neurocranium as axial compressive stresses, reinforced transversely by buttresses. Here, we review the literature on bony microarchitecture, 'in vivo' bone strain, and finite-element modeling of the facial skeleton of humans and nonhuman primates to address questions regarding the structural and functional existence of facial pillars and buttresses. Available bone material properties data do not support the existence of pillars and buttresses in humans or 'Sapajus apella'. Deformation regimes in the zygomatic complex emphasize bending and shear, therefore conceptualizing the zygomatic complex of humans or nonhuman primates as a pillar obscures its patterns of stress, strain, and deformation. Human fossil relatives and chimpanzees exhibit strain regimes corroborating the existence of a canine-frontal pillar, but the notion of a zygomatic pillar has no support. The emerging consensus on patterns of strain and deformation in finite element models (FEMs) of the human facial skeleton corroborates hypotheses in the clinical literature regarding zygomatic complex function, and provide new insights into patterns of failure of titanium and resorbable plates in experimental studies. It is suggested that the "pillar and buttress" model of human craniofacial skeleton function be replaced with FEMs that more accurately and precisely represent in vivo function, and which can serve as the basis for future research into implants used in restoration of occlusal function and fracture repair.