Options
Title
Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008:
Author(s)
Kleijn, David
Winfree, Rachael
Ricketts, Taylor H
Williams, Neal M
Lee Adamson, Nancy
Ascher, John S
Baldi, Andras
Batary, Peter
Benjamin, Faye
Biesmeijer, Jacobus C
Blitzer, Eleanor J
Bommarco, Riccardo
Bartomeus, Ignasi
Brand, Mariette R
Bretagnolle, Vincent
Button, Lindsey
Cariveau, Daniel P
Chifflet, Remy
Colville, Jonathan F
Danforth, Bryan N
Elle, Elizabeth
Garratt, Michael PD
Herzog, Felix
Carvalheiro, Luisa G
Holzschuh, Andrea
Howlett, Brad G
Jauker, Frank
Jha, Shalene
Knop, Eva
Krewenka, Kristin M
Le Feon, Violette
Mandelik, Yael
May, Emily A
Park, Mia G
Henry, Mickael
Pisanty, Gideon
Reemer, Menno
Riedinger, Verena
Rollin, Orianne
Rundlof, Maj
Sardinas, Hillary S
Scheper, Jeroen
Sciligo, Amber R
Smith, Henrik G
Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf
Isaacs, Rufus
Thorp, Robbin
Tscharntke, Teja
Verhulst, Jort
Viana, Blandina F
Vaissiere, Bernard E
Veldtman, Ruan
Ward, Kimiora L
Westphal, Catrin
Potts, Simon G
Klein, Alexandra-Maria
Kremen, Claire
M'Gonigle, Leithen K
Publication Date
2015
Open Access
Yes
Abstract
There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost-effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost-effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.
Publication Type
Journal Article
Source of Publication
Nature Communications, v.6, p. 1-9
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Place of Publication
United Kingdom
ISSN
2041-1723
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020
Peer Reviewed
Yes
HERDC Category Description
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Statistics to Oct 2018:
Visitors: 300<br />Views: 356<br />Downloads: 0
Permanent link to this record