Options
Title
Cultural validation of the structured clinical interview for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders in Indigenous Australians
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008:
Author(s)
Toombs, Maree
Nasir, Bushra
Kisely, Steve
Gill, Neeraj S
Beccaria, Gavin
Hayman, Noel
Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Srinivas N
Nicholson, Geoffrey C
Publication Date
2019-08-01
Early Online Version
Abstract
<b>Objective:</b> This study determined the cultural appropriateness of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) as an acceptable tool for diagnosing mental illness among Indigenous people.
<br/>
<b>Methods:</b> De-identified qualitative feedback from participants and psychologists regarding the cultural appropriateness of the SCID-I for Indigenous people using open-ended anonymous questionnaires was gathered. Aboriginal Medial Service staff and Indigenous Support Workers participated in a focus group.
<br/>
<b>Results:</b> A total of 95.6% of participants felt comfortable during the 498 questionnaires completed. Psychologists also provided qualitative feedback for 502 (92.3%) interviews, of whom 40.4% established a good rapport with participants. Of the participants, 77.7% understood the SCID-I questions well, while 72.5% did not require any cultural allowances to reach a clinical diagnosis.
<br/>
<b>Conclusion:</b> When administered by a culturally safe trained psychologist, SCID-I is well tolerated in this group.
<br/>
<b>Methods:</b> De-identified qualitative feedback from participants and psychologists regarding the cultural appropriateness of the SCID-I for Indigenous people using open-ended anonymous questionnaires was gathered. Aboriginal Medial Service staff and Indigenous Support Workers participated in a focus group.
<br/>
<b>Results:</b> A total of 95.6% of participants felt comfortable during the 498 questionnaires completed. Psychologists also provided qualitative feedback for 502 (92.3%) interviews, of whom 40.4% established a good rapport with participants. Of the participants, 77.7% understood the SCID-I questions well, while 72.5% did not require any cultural allowances to reach a clinical diagnosis.
<br/>
<b>Conclusion:</b> When administered by a culturally safe trained psychologist, SCID-I is well tolerated in this group.
Publication Type
Journal Article
Source of Publication
Australasian Psychiatry, 27(4), p. 362-365
Publisher
Sage Publications Ltd
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020
2019-06-05
Place of Publication
United Kingdom
ISSN
1440-1665
1039-8562
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020
Peer Reviewed
Yes
HERDC Category Description
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Permanent link to this record